Trump Calls For The "Termination" Of The US Constitution While Still Begging For 2020 Election Result To Be Nullified
Every single Republican is scared to utter a peep of opposition to Trump's demand.
In yet another deranged temper tantrum, Donald Trump called for the “termination of all rules, regulations, and articles” of the US Constitution as he begged — four weeks before the calendar turns to 2023 — for the 2020 election to be held again.
Trump claims there has been “a revelation of MASSIVE & WIDESPREAD FRAUD & DECEPTION”. Therefore, the results of the 2020 election should be thrown out and a the election should be held again. Trump cited no evidence for this fraud and deception, because no evidence exists, as amply shown by his Shlabotnikian 1-63 record in court (the one win had nothing to do with fraud).
On June 21, 2022, Arizona House Speaker Rusty Bowers (a Republican) told the January 6 Committee that he repeatedly asked Trump’s lawyers for any evidence of any fraud in any state. Rudy Giuliani admitted: “We’ve got lots of theories, we just don’t have the evidence.” Every single judge petitioned by Trump’s legal “elite strike force” — even judges appointed by Trump — laughed the suits out of court, ruling no evidence existed.
On Sunday, Rep. David Joyce (R-OH) told ABC’s George Stephanopoulos that he would vote for Trump in 2024 if he’s the Republican candidate, even in light of Trump’s desire to get rid of the Constitution. Stephanopoulos was dumbfounded. “That’s an extraordinary statement. You can’t come out against somebody who’s for suspending the Constitution?”
It is an extraordinary statement, for sure, but hasn’t Stephanopoulos been paying attention for the last six years? How can he be even the least bit surprised when a Republican refuses to speak ill of Trump, no matter what he has done or said. In the most recent example of how the party treats Trump like an infallible cult leader, no Republican dared to denounce Trump for dining with two Nazi-supporting anti-Semites, one of whom said a day or two later that he (a) loves Hitler and thinks Hitler is “cool”, (b) loves the Nazis (and does not like them being described as evil), and (c) believes the number of Jews killed by Hitler is a lie.
But wait!
No, You Do Not Have a Constitutional Right to Post Hunter Biden’s Dick Pic on Twitter
Tim Miller, The Bulwark, December 3, 2022
While normal humans who denied Republicans their red wave were enjoying an epic sports weekend, an insular community of MAGA activists and online contrarians led by the world’s richest man (for now) were getting riled up about a cache of leaked emails revealing that the former actor James Woods and Chinese troll accounts were not allowed to post ill-gotten photos of Hunter Biden’s hog on a private company’s microblogging platform 25 months ago.
Now if you are one of the normals—someone who would never think about posting another person’s penis on your social media account; has no desire to see politicians’ kids’ penises when scrolling social media; doesn’t understand why there are other people out there who care one way or another about the moderation policies surrounding stolen penis photos; or can’t even figure out what it is that I’m talking about—then this might seem like a gratuitous matter for an article. Sadly, it is not.
Because among Republican members of Congress, leading conservative media commentators, contrarian substackers, conservative tech bros, and friends of Donald Trump, the ability to post Hunter Biden’s cock shots on Twitter is the number-one issue in America this weekend. They believe that if they are not allowed to post porno, our constitutional republic may be in jeopardy.
I truly, truly wish I were joking.
Here’s a synopsis for the blessedly uninitiated . . .